
Each spring and fall our students take the MAP test. The MAP test is a computer-based testing system developed by the non-profit NWEA. MAPS stands for Measures of Academic Progress. It is a series of state-aligned computerized adaptive tests that accurately reflect the instructional level of each student and measures growth over time.
It's actually a pretty cool system in that it increases the level of difficulty (grade-level) of questions just to the point where students are able no longer able to correctly answer questions. Using this adaptive approach towards leveling off the questions the program determines the actual grade-level that a student is currently learning.
We completed our school-wide MAP testing for the spring and I was able to view some reports that our Media Specialist, Carol, generated. The particular report I looked at was for reading and it revealed something that is obvious to most of us, but it reinforces something that is good to consider as we head towards our out-of-school summertime... Our students at Euclid showed excellent growth in reading from fall to spring each year, but the progress they make during the school year is lost during the summer months. It's almost like starting over with kids when they return to school. Sure the students are one year older so they should be challenged with harder material than in the spring - I get that, but the number of kids that are considered advanced and/or proficient falls off each year after summer break.

I have a son with autism. He attends a year-round school. For him it is paramount that he receive a steady and uninterrupted stream of instruction year-round. His rate of learning is consistent, but slow. I have to think that our regular education students (and all students) would be better served by a year-round school - if one is to consider the rate of learning only. But of course many people before me have suggested this approach. I'll just start rambling and ranting if I continue with this point, so I'll leave you all with this urgent suggestion and the lesson learned from the MAP test.

No comments:
Post a Comment